Strategies to Target BCR-ABL1 Compound Mutants
Strategies to Target BCR-ABL1 Compound Mutants in CML and Ph+ALL
Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) leukemia is caused by BCR-ABL1, a constitutively active fusion kinase. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the ATP site of BCR-ABL1 are effective in treating chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) yet minimally effective at treating blast-phase CML and Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In the 20 years since the approval of the first TKI in all of medicine, imatinib, TKIs have dramatically improved survival of patients with CP-CML, resulting in a projected increase of CML prevalence from 70,000 Americans in 2010 to 180,000 in 2050.
Despite this progress, TKI-resistant CML remains a challenge, with >1,000 deaths annually in the U.S. At least 50% of TKI treatment failure arises through mutations in BCR-ABL1. Laboratory studies on the five FDA-approved BCR-ABL1 TKIs have established their mutational profiles against the >30 mutations observed in patients. In aggregate, these TKIs cover the clinical spectrum of BCR-ABL1 single point mutants. Ponatinib is the only TKI that is clinically effective against the T315I gatekeeper mutant. However, BCR-ABL1 compound mutants, defined as 2 mutations in the same BCR-ABL1 allele, that include T315I with any second mutation are resistant to all approved TKIs, including ponatinib, leaving these patients with no further treatment options.
Asciminib is the first inhibitor in clinical development that binds the BCR-ABL1 myristoyl site, an allosteric site distant from the ATP site, to enforce an autoinhibited, inactive conformation. We established that asciminib, like ponatinib, is not effective against T315Iinclusive compound mutants, yet combining ponatinib (but not nilotinib or dasatinib) with asciminib is extremely effective at inhibiting many T315I-inclusive compound mutant forms of BCR-ABL1. This discovery provides the basis for a novel therapeutic strategy to address an entirely unmetmedical need and is the foundation of this proposal.
In Aim 1, we will use computational, biophysical and crystallographic methods to decipher how ponatinib re-sensitizes compound mutant BCR-ABL1 to asciminib. We will test the combination in relevant mouse models and in primary leukemia samples.
In Aim 2 A, we will develop a therapeutic strategy for clinically resistant BCR-ABL1 compound mutants that are not inhibited by the combination of ponatinib with asciminib. Instead, we will target these mutants for proteasomal degradation using an asciminib proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) strategy. Unlike TKIs, PROTACs are effective even upon transient or weak binding. We will test the hypothesis that ponatinib-induced stabilization of the myristoyl site is the initiating event that allows subsequent binding of an asciminib-PROTAC and proteasomal degradation of compoundmutant BCR-ABL1.
In Aim 2 B, we will develop a ponatinib-PROTAC strategy for compound mutants carrying a myristoyl site resistance mutation. Our work will provide a rationale for clinical evaluation of ponatinib combined with asciminib as a therapy for currently untreatable BCR-ABL1 compound mutant leukemia. Compound mutations are also a major cause of resistance in acute myeloid leukemia, melanoma, and lung cancer, and our study will provide a blueprint for treating thesemalignancies.